No final da década de 90, a comunidade de Rio Natal, no município de São Bento do Sul, SC, passou a fazer parte de uma Área de Preservação Ambiental e desde então, muitas áreas de cultivo, paulatinamente, estão retomando o processo de formação florestal. Neste cenário, foi sugerido pela comunidade, a possibilidade de cultivo de plantas medicinais adaptadas às condições de sombreamento. Em atendimento a essa demanda foi realizada uma pesquisa participativa na comunidade, de 2005 a 2008, onde foram avaliadas 14 espécies de plantas medicinais com potencial de mercado, cultivadas em áreas sombreadas, em três propriedades familiares. Foram avaliados: taxa de sobrevivência das espécies, incidência de doenças e pragas, teor de massa seca e altura das plantas. Apresentaram persistência ao cultivo em áreas sombreadas as espécies: Curcuma longa L. (açafrão-da-índia); Arctium lappa L. (bardana); Pfaffia glomerata (Spreng) Pedersen (fáfia ou ginseng-brasileiro); Mikania glomerata Sprengel (guaco); Alternanthera brasiliana L. Kuntze (penicilina); Pogostemon cablin (Blanco) Benth (patchuli) e Maytenus ilicifolia Mart. Ex Reissek (espinheira-santa).

In the end of the 1990s, the Rio Natal community, located in the city of São Bento do Sul, in the Brazilian State of Santa Catarina, started to be part of an Environmental Protection Area. Since then, many cultivation areas have been increasingly having their forest restored. In this scenario, the community proposed to cultivate medicinal plants that were adapted to shaded conditions. To attend this demand, we carried out a participatory research in the community between 2005 and 2008. Fourteen species of medicinal plants having market potential were evaluated, and were cultivated in shaded areas, in three family properties. The survival of the species, the incidence of illnesses and pests, the dry matter value and the height of the plants were evaluated. The species that presented persistence to be cultivated in shaded areas were: Curcuma longa L.; Arctium lappa L.; Pfaffia glomerata (Spreng) Pedersen.; Mikania glomerata Sprengel.; Alternanthera sp.; Pogostemon cablin (Blanco) Benth. e Maytenus ilicifolia Mart. Ex Reissek.

The survival of hemodialysis patients is likely to be influenced not only by well-known risk factors like age and comorbidity, but also by changes in dialysis technology and practices accumulated along time. We compared the survival curves, dialysis routines and some risk factors of two groups of patients admitted to a Brazilian maintenance hemodialysis program during two consecutive decades: March 1977 to December 1986 (group 1, N = 162) and January 1987 to June 1997 (group 2, N = 237). The median treatment time was 22 months (range 1-198). Survival curves were constructed using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log-rank method. The Cox proportional hazard regression model was used to investigate the more important variables associated with outcome. The most important changes in dialysis routine and in patient care during the total period of observation were the progressive increase in the dose of dialysis delivered, the prohibition of potassium-free dialysate, the use of bicarbonate as a buffer and the upgrading of the dialysis equipment. There were no significant differences between the survival curves of the two groups. Survival rates at 1, 5 and 10 years were 84, 53 and 29%, respectively, for group 1 and 77, 42 and 21% for group 2. Patients in group 1 were younger (45.5 ± 15.2 vs 55.2 ± 15.9 years, P<0.001) and had a lower prevalence of diabetes (11.1 vs 27.4%, P<0.001) and of cardiovascular disease (9.3 vs 20.7%, P<0.001). According to the Cox multivariate model, only age (hazard ratio (HR) 1.04, confidence interval (CI) 1.03-1.05, P<0.001) and diabetes (HR 2.55, CI 1.82-3.58, P<0.001) were independent predictors of mortality for the whole group. Patients of group 2 had a lower prevalence of sudden death (19.1 vs 9.7%, P<0.001). After adjusting for age, diabetes and other mortality risk factors, the risk of death was 17% lower in group 2, although this difference was not statistically significant. We conclude that the negative effects of advanced age and of higher frequency of comorbidity on the survival of group 2 patients were probably offset by improvements in patient care and in the quality and dose of dialysis delivered, so that the survival curves did not undergo significant changes along time.